Third, the innate perception of time and space constitutes people's sensitivity to numbers, which defines the sense of presence.

The fourth type, the action is the responsibility of the subject of the thing, is the presentation of the will, and what drives it is the 'motivation'.

The above is the core statement of The Fourfold Roots of the Law of Sufficient Reason, understand?

The boy nodded vigorously while taking notes: Well, I understand, as soon as the professor said it, I understood! Professor you are amazing!

Shang Muxiao sneered, and he didn't bother to hide his contempt. He seemed to think that it was really unprofessional to talk about such a problem.

I don't know where he got the courage to laugh at others when he failed the exam.

Anyone else have questions?

Shang Muxiao raised his hand lazily, as if he had no hope that I would order him.

But I just clicked and asked: What do you want to ask?

If he says something or not, I would justifiably invite him out.

Shang Muxiao was obviously stunned for a while, quite surprised, but he quickly recovered and described his problem fluently and clearly.

Love that is not blessed by the world should obey reason or instinct?

It depends on which theory you prefer to believe.

He further asked: What if it was to teach you? When you meet your other half, but your love is not blessed by the world, do you choose to listen to reason or return to instinct?

The difference between humans and animals is that humans have reason. Rationality can enable us to better plan the future, take the initiative, and reduce risks. I don't think we should give up this part of the rights.

But reason also makes us lose our sensitivity to things. Shang Muxiao and I argued rationally, 'Rationality makes us gain, but also makes us lose'. Shouldn't this sentence mean that rationality is not that important?

This is Schopenhauer's original words, it seems that he came prepared.

To be honest, this is not a difficult question to answer. It does not have much philosophical nature in it, but it is more suitable as a debate topic for debate, so that both parties can understand.

I thought he was going to ask some good questions, but it turned out to be nothing more than that.

I am a rationalist, you are an irrationalist. We are not of the same faction, how can we be together? You are willing to return to instinct, I prefer to listen to reason, from the beginning, we have differences. You can't convince me, and I have no intention to convince you. Philosophy is an existence full of various opinions and speculations, and there is no need to distinguish between them.

There is no point in arguing this question any further. I want to stop it, but he is still extending it.

So you're never driven by instinct, always sane, are you? He leaned forward slightly, his tone and expression changed slightly from the moment before, he seemed unconvinced, but also seemed to wait and see, in those dark eyes, there was a straightforward eagerness to try.

He felt that he could get me to break my sanity, go against my principles, and leave today's insights behind. Looking at his young and arrogant face, I already knew what he was thinking.

He wasn't asking a dumb question, he was just laying the groundwork for one day in the future to laugh at me for being a rationalist.

Bad pup.

I didn't give him that opportunity and quickly closed the issue.

My opinion doesn't matter. This question is over, the next one.

Not getting the answer he really wanted, he leaned back in his chair a little boringly, playing with a ballpoint pen in his hand, with a slight smile on his lips, and silently said three words to me.

--coward.

I swiped nonchalantly and started to answer the next question.

Since the betting contract took effect, Shang Muxiao has reported to my office every day before leaving get off work and sent me home.

I don't quite believe that he really wants to chase after me, after thinking about it, his sudden change may just be out of some weird desire to win - he has to prove that all my denials are denials, and I am He has deep covetousness towards him, he has a bad heart, he is a person who is full of benevolence, righteousness and morality, and is full of male thieves and female prostitutes.

If Yan Ying is an arrogant person who thinks that she can take over the world with her beauty alone, then Shang Muxiao is no less so.

If he wants to love, you must give him love. If you don't give it, he will rob him. If you grab it, you will probably only satisfy a certain collection addiction, and you will not cherish it. I always feel that he must have been lacking in love when he was a child.

To understand, I no longer resist his pursuit. I'm still happy when someone takes me home every day. It's just a child's game, as long as he's tired of it, he'll naturally go away.

Are you free on Saturday? Take you to a good place. Stop at the old seat, Shang Muxiao pulled on the handbrake and sent me a date invitation.

No time, I have an appointment with a friend on Saturday.

Yang Haiyang asked me to make an appointment earlier, which is not against the rules. Unfastening the seat belt, I saw that Shang Muxiao was still not moving, and asked him what was wrong with his eyes.

What about next Saturday? He was facing me, with one elbow on the steering wheel, and the expression on his face was much lighter than before.

So a child is a child, and everything is put on his face.

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like