Rebirth As a Writer In Britain

"No? Teacher Collison, what you said is true? Someone really reported me plagiarism?" Kevin couldn't believe his ears.

"Why, you don't know about this? I thought you knew. Yes, someone wrote an article and published it in the "British Literary Morning Post", and it was the headline news. They said that your recent "Ode to the Nightingale" has Suspected of plagiarism," Collison told.

"Oh, I have been thinking about new books, so I didn't pay much attention. Thank you for telling me the news, dear Teacher Collison." Kevin said.

"You are welcome. I believe you, Kevin, I believe you are an honest person. You are not plagiarizing other people's articles as the article says."

"Thank you. I'm looking for this article to get an overview."

After Kevin and Collison hung up, they went online to check news about their plagiarism. I didn't expect him to look for it. When he opened Twitter, the news was already in the headlines. Not only that, many people also forwarded this tweet to him.

"The genius writer Kevin is a plagiarism"? what's the problem? Did you plagiarize an article from a previous life on the earth and was discovered.

Kevin thought for a while, then calmed down again, because it was absolutely impossible. Although "Jane Eyre" and "Wuthering Heights" and "Ode to the Nightingale" are all plagiarism works by British writers on earth.

But before plagiarism, Kevin worked hard to check the information and learned from the memory of the reborn person that there is absolutely no such works in this world, and naturally there is no John Keats who wrote "Ode to the Nightingale."

Therefore, in a sense, these works written by Kevin-"Jane Eyre", "Wuthering Heights" and "Ode to the Nightingale" are absolutely original works in this parallel world in Britain, and they cannot be discovered by others. It is plagiarism.

Of course, there will be a situation, that is, in this parallel world of Britain, there is still a person who comes from the earth like Kevin, and also has a good understanding of British works. But this possibility is even lower than the probability of buying a two-color ball to win the prize, or even almost zero.

So what the **** is going on----Kevin is deeply puzzled.

Kevin opened the article that said he had plagiarized and read it carefully several times. The general content is that he should not have such a good writing and such a deep understanding of life at such a young age.

Also, the recently completed "Ode to the Nightingale" is suspected of plagiarizing Northern Irish writer Charleston Noffi's work.

When Kevin saw this, he planned to find the Northern Irish writer Charleston Nophie's work that the other party said. After all, this writer said by the other party. Kevin is also not clear.

then. Kevin began to search for the author's work on the Internet, and finally he found a work that the other party said was the same as his own "Ode to the Nightingale."

The name of this article is "The Thrush Bird". Kevin read it carefully. This article does have some similarities with "Ode to the Nightingale". Especially things. Because the other party wrote the beautiful song of the thrush, which is almost the same as the charming song of the nightingale that I wrote.

But "The Thrush Bird" just stays at the singing level of the Thrush. He is just trying to express the beauty of his girlfriend with the beauty of the song of the thrush, which means that this writer thinks his girlfriend is as intoxicating as the singing of the thrush and the thrush. This is completely different from the idea conveyed by "Ode to the Nightingale".

Besides, on the pen. The Northern Irish writer Charleston Norfe is naturally too far apart from "Ode to the Nightingale." So the terms are completely different. This does not constitute a definition of plagiarism.

However, because of Kevin's recent prosperous reasons, some people have caught the handle. Want to take the opportunity to hype up the topic.

Kevin took a closer look and felt that, strictly speaking, this is not plagiarism at all. Because no one stipulates that the same thing cannot be described. No one wants others to write thrush, so you can't write nightingale. Moreover. In terms of words and sentences, this Northern Irish writer is a thousand miles away from "Ode to the Nightingale." If it was plagiarism, it would simply raise the level of the writer.

John Keats, the author of "Ode to the Nightingale" was born in London at the end of the 18th century. One of the outstanding British poets and writers, and a major member of the Romantic School. He is so talented that he is as famous as Shelley and Byron. His poems are considered to perfectly embody the characteristics of Western romantic poetry, and Keats is also regarded as an outstanding representative of the romantic movement in Europe.

The poems written by such characters are still said to be plagiarism, and Kevin finds it ridiculous to think about it.

It was confirmed that he was not a copyist, and Kevin didn't bother to care about it. Anyone who likes to take the opportunity to make hype should go for it. Anyway, I am innocent, and I am not afraid of what they say.

It's not just Kevin who looked up the works of this Northern Irish writer for comparison, but also those who are more curious about this matter. People who support and like Kevin are just as Kevin thought. This does not constitute a definition of plagiarism.

What is the definition of plagiarism: it refers to the act of stealing others' works as one's own, completely copying others' works and changing its form or content to a certain extent in the same way of use.

However, Kevin's "Ode to the Nightingale" and Northern Irish writer's "Thrush Bird" are not relevant at all except for the beautiful singing of Asuka, so how can you plagiarize it?

But those who were jealous and dissatisfied with Kevin do not think so. They rarely find an opportunity to suppress and demean Kevin, and naturally they will not let it go.

Especially Zella and Augustine, they both expressed their views on plagiarism on their Twitter.

Zella said on Twitter: "The thing I hate the most in my life is plagiarism. I hope there are fewer plagiarisms in this beautiful country."

Augustine said directly by naming the names of the paintings: "There is no doubt that I am very disgusted with Kevin's plagiarism. This is an insult to English literature."

In addition to Zella and Augustine who expressed their opinions, others also followed suit.

"I didn't expect that Kevin is really a copycat. I am very disappointed. Alas!"

"It was hard to think that a literary genius appeared in the UK, but in the end it appeared as a plagiarism. This is shameful and unsatisfactory. I hope Kevin can apologize to the original creator."

"I just said, how could this young man who is still studying can write such good poems and articles? I now deeply suspect that all his works are plagiarism. He is a complete plagiarism. By."

"Yes. Everyone is looking for it hard. Maybe "Jane Eyre" and "Wuthering Heights" are also plagiarizing others. Otherwise, how can Kevin write books so fast? This has violated the logic of normal people. ."

With the help of these people, things about Kevin's plagiarism have become more and more troublesome. Even the famous poetry critic David Lee, who had just returned home, learned of the news.

After seeing the news that Kevin's "Ode to the Nightingale" was plagiarized, he was so surprised that he almost couldn't stand firm.

"Plaagiarism from "Ode to the Nightingale"? What is going on."

In the past few days, David Lee also wrote reviews for this poem, so if "Ode to the Nightingale" is plagiarized, it would be a slap in the face.

But he knows both English and foreign poetry. In his memory, there is no poem that is the same as Kevin's "Ode to the Nightingale"? How could it be called plagiarism?

He put down the drink in his hand, and then read the ins and outs of the incident, including the Northern Irish writer's Thrush.

"It's nonsense. They are different except for the beautiful singing of birds. If this is considered plagiarism, then literature does not exist. Poetry does not exist." David Lee said angrily. .

After David Lee finished his anger, he called Kevin again. After all, he was worried that this young man would not think about it because of the plagiarized news.

After seeing David Lee's call, Kevin had already guessed that the purpose of his call was the same as Collison. After all, things about one's own plagiarism have spread in the literary world.

"Hi! Dear Mr. David Lee, do you want to comfort me too?" Kevin said.

"Yes, Kevin, I know about this soon. I also watched the other party's "Thrush". I don't think this is plagiarism at all, so you don't have to worry too much." David Lee comforted.

"Thank you for your comfort~www.NovelMTL.com~ Don't worry, I didn't take this matter to heart. A wise man once told me not to care too much about others' evaluation of you and do what you like to do." Kevin said,

"Well, that's great. Seeing your mentality. I'm relieved. Literati is weak, this is the fault of the global literati. So some people will always catch some of your things, and then take the opportunity to hype. So, You need a strong heart."

"I have a strong heart all the time, and I deeply believe that every Englishman should have it. Dear Mr. David Lee, thank you for calling and comforting me. Don't worry, I really don't want this. influences."

Now that Kevin could see so fast, David Lee was relieved and hung up the phone. But for this matter, he was still very angry.

So he felt that he should do something for Kevin. After all, this song "Ode to the Nightingale" has personally written reviews. He didn't want to be tainted by the perfection of this poem.

But David Li Yue tried to do this, but got the opposite result. Because the logic of most people is: David Lee has written reviews for "Ode to Nightingale", so he will naturally come out and say good things for "Ode to Nightingale". (To be continued.) Enable new URL