Rewrite the Technological Landscape

Meng Qian's particularity and subtlety has caused many US companies to hesitate in their decision-making. Indeed, more American entrepreneurs have different ideas about Meng Qian.

But they still have no intention to make concessions. Meng Qian cannot really rely on his own vision to change American entrepreneurs, because they are only entrepreneurs after all. Behind them, there are capital and politics. In fact, individual entrepreneurs are also There is not much ability to change capital and politics. The confrontation is still there, but the atmosphere has become more and more confusing, and everything has become strangely flat.

But as a rebirth, Meng Qian knows that this bizarre harmony will not last long, because capital will act, and politics will act.

Therefore, Meng Qian convened a meeting with the heads of almost all the company's project teams. Those who can participate on-site participate in the scene, and those who cannot participate on-site participate in video.

"A lot of things have happened recently, and everyone should have felt it. In fact, as I said at the annual meeting, we laid a good foundation in the first ten years. We have consolidated the foundation. The next ten years will be ours. At the stage of building, what kind of image Dafeng Group will eventually show to the world depends on how we will build this building in the next ten years.

The reason for bringing everyone together today is to share with you a little bit of my personal thoughts. I hope we can build a completely different building, instead of just saying, oh, the building is pretty. High, but it’s still the same. I hope that ten years later, when the world sees us, it will exclaim like this. It turns out that the building can still be built like this. "

Everyone took out paper and pen to make a record to prepare, "In the current process of technological development, I have summarized three common technological development models. The first is analogy, the second is iteration, and the third is First principles.

The so-called analogy is a development model based on experience. Through the use of past experience, we can find patterns and features to gradually promote product development. In the field of analogy development, Intel is a representative company.

The advantage of this technological development model lies in excellence, but the disadvantage lies in its limitations.

The so-called iteration is essentially a process of repeated feedback. Through continuous repetition, the result is constantly approached. An important difference between iteration and analogy is that the result of each iteration will be used as the initial value of the next iteration. This is a continuous process. The evolutionary thinking model requires experience, but it is above experience.

This iterative process is actually a decoupling process. If you make good use of this iterative model, you can effectively avoid misunderstandings caused by experience, and constantly break through product restrictions through technological development and user needs. The result of this process is: Optimization and innovation.

The iconic company of iteration is Apple. Apple has almost no original technology, but Apple has achieved effective innovation in all the technologies of its predecessors. With the same technology in Apple's hands, it knows how to make the technology more in line with user needs. "

When Meng Qian cited Apple as an example, the employees' reaction was a little cold, mainly because the Apple mobile phones in this life were suppressed by the Dafeng Group, and Apple has no reputation in China.

"Finally, let’s talk about the first principles. Aristotle said that in the exploration of each system, the first principle of existence is the most basic proposition or hypothesis. It cannot be ignored or deleted, and cannot be ignored. violation.

In fact, the current technological development is basically analogical thinking and iterative thinking, until more people start to consider first principles, giving a new idea for the development of science and technology. In terms of first principles, the iconic company is Tesla.

Musk used the first principles to break the traditional imprisonment of batteries and realize Tesla's technical advantages in batteries. The so-called first principles, the core is to abandon everything and constantly explore the essence of things.

The biggest advantage of first principles is that it can approach or even approach the optimal solution, so the first principle corresponds to subversion. "

The employees listened very carefully, and Meng Qian continued to in-depth, "After talking about these three models of technological development, we should discuss the development of our Dafeng Group and what thinking mode should we start with.

After reading these three interpretations, does anyone think that first principles are the best thinking for technological development? "

Meng Qian asked, no one in the meeting room raised his hand, Meng Qian smiled and nodded, "Whether someone didn't raise their hand out of shyness or not, but I hope everyone really doesn't think so.

I believe that when the interpretation of these three models is posted on the Internet, many netizens will think that the first principles are the most powerful. In contrast, the previous analog and iterative models seem to be very backward, and then they start to tout Musk.

But as a scientific researcher, everyone must have the ability to think independently, and we must remember that any thinking must have an adaptability problem, especially for the development of science and technology, adaptability is very important.

Was the first principle in the development of science and technology pioneered by Musk? Of course not. In history, many people have used this mode of thinking, such as our company's trump card technology artificial intelligence.

In the era of neural networks, some people realized that the key to artificial intelligence is big data analysis. They abandoned some complicated content and wanted algorithms to learn by themselves, but they all failed.

They were not wrong, they also saw the essence of things, but the hardware conditions at that time were not enough, and the algorithm logic at that time was also problematic. What we can do today cannot be done 20 years ago, so the first principle is used What is the big premise? "

"Basic environment." The person sitting in the front row responded.

Meng Qian nodded and said that he was correct, "It is good to subvert. Who doesn't want to be a subversive, but sometimes you just can't subvert.

But the same theory cannot be subverted this year, and it may be subverted next year, especially in this era of rapid change, we never know when the foundation will be sufficient.

Therefore, effective subversion may become a frequent trial and error process in this era. If this is the case, have you discovered that something interesting has happened? Subversion requires analogy and iteration.

So today I want to propose a new theory: the dynamic cycle development model. "

Meng Qian put the principle of the model on the big screen for everyone to see for themselves, "In my opinion, there is no high ground between the first principle, iteration, and analogy, but a complementary relationship.

Many people in the field of physics are pursuing a unified theory, hoping to explain everything with a simple theory. Einstein pursued it this way, Newton pursued it this way, and the latecomers were looking for this unified theory.

And what is the unified theory of physics, ordinary people like me may not know for a lifetime, but about this process of technological development, I suddenly thought, maybe we can find the possibility of a unified theory~www.NovelMTL.com ~It's just that this unified theory is dynamic.

Everyone looks at these three models and thinks about it. Subversion again and again, innovation again and again, repetition again and again, and these things are carried out over and over again. What is this?

Many employees' stares grew bigger and bigger, until someone shouted, "Create!"

Meng Qian gave an affirmative look, "Yes, we will suddenly discover that this is actually a process of continuous creation. I dare not be 100% sure that this theory is correct, but I am willing to try to use this dynamic change as a A unified theory.

A dynamic repetitive behavior of subversive innovation may become the best model for technological development.

If you feel that this theory has something to learn from, then in the next work, you can consider to carry out collaborative work based on the three lines of subversion, innovation and repetition, and try to verify the feasibility of this theory.

Because our goal is to be a creative enterprise.

In the next ten years, I hope everyone can create an unprecedented building. "