The Black Technology Era of Xueba

Chi Eugene was originally an assistant and student of Fisher. After seeing Pangu Technology launching a neuron chip, he felt like he knew each other.

This feeling drove him to find the connection between the two.

It was found that Pangu Technology ’s research on thinking and the development of neuron chips were actually deepened, improved and improved based on the research of Professor Fehel of the Brain Institute more than 20 years ago.

Is the current research result of Pangu Technology, which was proposed by the European Brain Institute twenty years ago.

But there is a problem. Professor Fisher's research on this problem was considered nonsense by the Institute twenty years ago. Professor Fisher himself was also subject to the technology at the time, but only raised this topic. My thoughts are not as deep as research. Therefore, this research topic has been put there.

Due to his lack of attention in European laboratories and his own research achievements, Fisher returned to the United States and published his research directions and conjectures in a non-professional academic weekly.

Attention, just published research directions and conjectures, not research results.

In the following ten or twenty years, the name Fisher almost disappeared in academia. No one knows where he is now, or whether he is still engaged in brain and thinking research.

Fisher's research on the Posner cluster is also disappearing, and is gradually forgotten by the academic community.

Had it not been for this time that Pangu Technology had produced a neuron chip, the term Posner cluster would have been forgotten by humans.

Pangu Technology is not a copy of Fisher's research results, because Fisher has no research results at all, but just put forward his own ideas and concepts.

However, there is a convention in science. Whoever proposes a concept and names it will generally use this name in future research.

Posner set is also the English description of Pangu Technology, and the Chinese description is the neuron cluster.

Therefore, in summary, it is impossible to talk about Pangu's plagiarism of the research results of Fisher and the European Brain Thinking Laboratory, because they have no results at all.

But as a member of the European Institute, as a proud European, he was very excited to be able to find such clues, and informed his senior management of his findings.

This incident also attracted great attention from the high-level academic circles in Europe. They soon arranged to find all traces of Fisher's research in detail and sent someone to contact Professor Fisher in the United States. I hope he can come forward and give a description. .

The results are mixed.

Fortunately, after digging through the boxes to find Professor Fisher's research materials, they found that Fisher's manuscript and conceived research steps, as well as the results of his own conjecture, had too many similarities with the results of Pangu Technology.

Worryingly, after contacting Professor Miguel Fisher's family, he learned that Professor Fisher had died five years ago, and he had not achieved any results before his death.

It's okay, people talk better when they die.

I do n’t know if it ’s the Europeans who want to find their dignity or they are going to touch the porcelain. The European Brain Institute used Fisher ’s research report to write a voluminous dissertation and complaint about thinking and brain research.

The content of the complaint report is obvious, Pangu Technology plagiarized the results of the European Brain Institute, and it was Baiji.

After seeing the control report during this time, the European media, which was very miserable by Pangu Technology, was still thinking, should you reprint it?

After all, the negative reports on Pangu Science and Technology caused great losses to the European media some time ago.

In this era, fake news and stigmatizing news are not so easy to make.

Because you have the right to send, Super Junior has the right to pack your rights technically. This is such a hooligan, that is so unreasonable.

But this time it seems different.

The research results and complaint reports of the European Brain Research Center look well-founded, and the supporting materials they provide are "research results" twenty years ago, and the research results of Pangu Technology are the latest, that is, Pangu Technology has It may have been plagiarized by the academic achievements of the European Brain Research Center.

Chiu Eugene was pushed to the foreground by the European Brain Institute as Fisher's assistant twenty years ago.

In an interview with the media, Eugene said with certainty: "Twenty years ago, my supervisor, Professor Fisher, a well-known brain and thinking research expert, proposed the Posner cluster, and very positively Formation is actually a kind of quantum motion, and he also proposed that this kind of quantum motion can actually be linked with quantum devices based on quantum chips. "

Saying that it was, Eugene's expression was dim, he said, "Later, Professor Fisher faded out of the laboratory due to physical reasons, but as his students, my team and I have been doing research on this experiment. We Achieved leading results. "

"A few years ago we studied all several Chinese researchers who joined our research group as students or visitors. Later, our related information about the Posner cluster was lost, and later ..."

I said here, Eugene shrugged.

Chi Eugene also has ambitions. Such a major R & D result will definitely win the Nobel Prize! What he has to do is to tell the world that Pangu Technology is stealing and using the results of the European Brain Institute ~ www.NovelMTL.com ~ All the achievements of Pangu Technology and Xiao Ming originally belonged to the European Brain Institute and belonged to him Eugene.

Orderly and well-founded, and evidence from twenty years ago.

Chi Eugene even pulled out a paper on Posner clusters published by his mentor, Fisher, in a third-rate academic journal twenty years ago as evidence.

The originally silent European public circles, urged by European political factors and academia, reported on the incident and pointed their finger directly at Pangu Technology.

European academics believe that this is an excellent opportunity to attack Pangu technology and build European academic confidence.

Prior to European media reports, several European academic groups and organizations supported Eugene and the European Brain Thinking Institute behind him and strongly condemned academic plagiarism. They asked relevant laboratories to apologize to the European Brain Thinking Institute. And, in accordance with the guidelines of colleagues in the academic community, submit subsequent results to the European Brain Institute for free.

This is European hooliganism.

The public opinion community was not idle, and it reported in detail the interview with Eugene, and made public the research data provided by Eugene 20 years ago.

The Times commented: "The Posner cluster is the crystallization of European scientific research, but it was used by the Xia people for plagiarism."

Https: //

The genius remembers the site address for one second :. Mobile website reading URL: