The Creator of the Second Dimension

Peanut.com's scoring is divided into three forms, simple scoring, short review, and long review.

Scoring is to give a score from one to five stars, short reviews are reviews with a score within 140 words, and long reviews are reviews beyond 140 words.

The comprehensive score is a combination of the three, and there is a complex algorithm in the middle, which combines the account level, the number of ratings, the number of likes of the comments, etc., to finally get a score.

Normally, the score of a work will follow a normal distribution, which is based on a score, with small ends at the two ends and large in the middle, while some works will be the other way round, with large ends at the two ends and small in the middle. Such works are either evaluations. The polarization is extremely obvious, or it was scored by the navy.

Just like asking about having its own big V system, Peanut.com also has senior film critics, and Wang Han is one of them.

He is not a film major, but he usually likes to record a little afterthought. Over time, he has a familiar face in Peanut.com related groups and is considered a senior film critic.

In fact, it’s not difficult to write film reviews. Wang Han feels that, especially in places like Peanut.com, you only need to write something about the snow in Strasbourg, and the tall and tall scenery like the silent night as the background, and then pull it. The names of some film production teams and past works, and then throw a bit of professional terms, and finally get a lyrical ending that seems to understand but not understand, can make those literary and artistic young people pursued to die alive.

For example, a film review written by Wang Han before: "The first time I watched this movie was in the dusk of a white pigeon flying in Prague Square. There was a small cafe there. The owner was a 60-year-old man with a beard. Grandpa, the aroma of cappuccino is lingering, just as this movie brings me, with a bit of bitterness in the ethereal, and a little reminiscence in the thickness. The director of the movie is... after watching this movie. It was already night, I checked out, walked out of the cafe, exhaled a breath of vain, lingering away, just like the end of the movie, maybe it's time to go home, lonely and cold night, only the cat by the road accompanied me ."

It looks like a variety of literature and art. In fact, that movie is a literary and artistic film that has never been shown in the country by a small audience. The standard in the film industry is just so-so. Moreover, Wang Han has never been to Prague or cafes. Grandpa, even cats are fabricated.

And it is this kind of film reviews that have been highly praised on Peanut.com. In various groups, Wang Han is a big fan of those young people, and he is sought after wherever he goes.

The popularity of "The Garden of Words" also made Wang Han decide to make a film review in the same way. First, of course, he watched the movie. Since he didn't have an account on Chuyin Video, he was not willing to spend money, so I can only find someone to borrow an account.

After watching, Wang Han breathed a sigh of relief. This animated film indeed exceeded his expectations, and even reminded him of his longing for a young teacher in his student days.

Can't help but go to the balcony to light a cigarette, Wang Han returned to his position and was just about to play a wave of his creative desires, but the QQ group rang.

This is an anonymous group. Almost all trumpets are in the group. Behind the trumpets, there are film critics like Wang Han. The group owner is an operation person in charge of Peanut. The ID is usually [group owner] , No one in the group speaks at all, and discussions will only occur at certain specific times.

[Group leader]: Here is a list, you can check it out if you are interested.

He sent a flash photo, which will be destroyed immediately after viewing it, it is almost impossible to save, and no evidence will be left.

Wang Han clicked on it and found that it was a screenshot of the text, and the requirement was to write a long review of "The Garden of Words".

If it is an ordinary long review, then there is no need for the other party to say, the people in the group will naturally write to cheat likes.

But what I asked for this time was a bad review.

It's not a one-star bad review that obviously takes money to do things. The text given in the text is three stars to four stars, which is between six and eight points, which is much lower than the current 9.2.

Wang Han frowned slightly, is this the company that has gotten into trouble?

Generally speaking, buying a bad review is not just a simple disapproval of the eye, and there are more disputes about interests behind it.

[Liu Bei]: I watched this animation and it was really good. This bad review is a bit difficult to write.

[Cao Cao]: Hey, I’ve already posted a film review. It’s five stars. Isn’t it a bit too good to change it now?

[Zhuge Liang]: I'm still going to write an essay. I have to consider how much the bill will cost.

People in the group asked, the general trend of Peanut.com now is to play "The Garden of Words". If they are professional film critics suddenly posting a bad review, it will easily affect their reputation.

To put it simply, everyone needs to have a meal, but there is also a standard for a meal. You can't just make it by anyone. If it happens to be a bad meal or bad money, it will not be worth the loss.

There are also many types of navy. The low-level navy uses a bunch of low-level trumpets for evaluation. The intermediate navy will contact some film critics to write soft essays. The high-level navy is like this group. Poor and particularly outrageous points.

[Group leader]: The other party gave this number.

He sent another flash photo, and Wang Han clicked on it, suddenly startled.

They gave too much money.

It can be seen that this is to buy black "The Garden of Words".

Wang Han thought about it, and finally succumbed to the money, and asked the group leader to take this order. In this wave, he earned more than the previous orders.

He has rich experience in writing this kind of comment ~www.NovelMTL.com~, and he quickly concocted an article that seemed objective and neutral, which was both positive and negative, and published it with a little revision.

After the publication, Wang Han does not have to worry about the follow-up. The navy team will like his comments and reply up, which will eventually affect the algorithm. After all, this is a big source of income for Peanut. In the past, regardless of the quality, most of the movies were released. When the announcement is made, Peanut.com will contact Peanut.com and let its score be more relaxed. Relying on this gray income of protection fees, Peanut.com has made a lot of money behind the scenes.

According to Wang Han’s analysis, the first thing about "The Garden of Words" is that the magic movie does not manage Peanut. It seems that the protection fee has not been paid enough. Secondly, there are several other movies on the Children’s Day file. Including the "Superman Pig Superman Movie" made by Tomato, and the big variety movie "Where is Mommy" on Mango Satellite TV. The current ratings of these two films are 6.5 and 5.7 on Peanut. I still bought them. The situation of the navy, and from the box office list, "Superman Pig" has only a box office of over 100 million in just over a week, and "Where is Mom" ​​because of the popularity of variety shows and celebrities, the box office has exceeded 300 million, but it is not enough. "The Garden of Words" was played.

This time, Wang Han estimated that he was one of the companies behind the two films.

()