The days of being a spiritual mentor in Meiman

Let's look at the second case. In fact, your judgment has gone wrong since this case. Do you think the same person did the work in the first case and the second case?

Batman thought for a while and said: If you follow this theory, there are indeed some problems. If he could use anesthetics when he killed Lawrence, he could also use anesthetics when he killed Hawke, but judging from the strangle marks on Hawke's body, he When tied to the chair, she was conscious and even struggled.

What do you think this means?

Batman also began to pace the room, he said: According to the forensic autopsy report, the anesthetic in Lawrence's body was first inhaled through the mouth and nose, and then injected into the body. Therefore, the murderer's method of subduing Lawrence may be, After entering his bedroom, covering his mouth and nose with a towel soaked in anesthesia, he was given another injection of anesthesia, then dragged to the ground, and nailed through his body with spikes...

Following his description, the scene of the room began to change constantly, Rich’s body disappeared on the ground, the walls and the floor changed colors, a bed fell from mid-air, Lawrence was lying on the bed covered with a quilt, obviously sleeping , At this time, a black figure walked to his bed and pressed a towel soaked in anesthetic on his mouth and nose.

Then, he dragged the fainted Lawrence out of the bed, injected an anesthetic into his body, took out a spike and nailed it to his body, and put him in a cross position with his head facing the window.

The process of subduing Hawke should be simpler. The murderer walked into his study, strangled him from behind, and tied him to a chair.

Speaking of this, Batman paused, and Schiller continued: I think you should have seen that the murderer didn't intend to talk to Lawrence at all. He killed Lawrence after he subdued him.

But in the Hawke case, after the murderer subdued Hawke, tied him up, and waited for him to wake up, what you said, the strangle marks on his body are the evidence...

Following Schiller's description, the scene of the room changed again, the bed sank into the floor, Lawrence's body disappeared, a desk stretched out from the middle of the wall, Hawke sat on the chair and slid to the desk, and at this moment, a black Shadow stood behind him and strangled him with his arms, and Hawk woke up to find himself strapped to a chair.

Looking out of the window, the standing shadow and the sitting Hawk were talking, but in the end, Hawk's head rolled down and blood erupted.

The killer didn't speak to Lawrence, but he did speak to Hawke. Why? Schiller asked.

Batman fell into deep thought. He thought it was a useful idea. After a while he asked, If it were you, would you talk to the victim?

Schiller shook his head and said, This cannot be generalized, but depends on the nature of the crime. Let me give you an example...

Schiller tapped the floor again with his cane and said, If I just needed a qualified victim, then I wouldn't communicate with the victim because he's just a raw material, just like you don't look at someone when you're cooking. Broccoli speaks the same.

However, in some special cases, communication before death is necessary. For example, in some homicide cases with trial nature, it is necessary to listen to the communication of the victim's thoughts before death.

Because at this time, the prey that is about to meet death is my partner, and of course I would be happy to chat with him about my creative ideas.

As you said before, if this is the theme of the seven deadly sins, then the prey I choose must commit one of the seven deadly sins, and before I do it, I will tell them that they will be killed for a certain crime Death, their reactions are also part of the creation, and the guilt, anger, and fear that surge out are the most exciting part of this murder case.

As for the topic of the Twelve Apostles, I don't think there is any need to communicate with the victim. Do you expect a gang boss to talk to you about the Gospel or something? Do you expect them to have any unique insights into this kind of religious story?

That's why I said that the murderer is just a poor imitator, because what he and Hawk talked about must have nothing to do with this case, and it is likely to be those extremely boring gangster insiders.

His behavior, if you have to compare it, is like the rat droppings in a pot of rat soup...

Schiller obviously disapproved of this approach, he paused, and then said: Looking at the third case, I don't really want to comment on this case, because it really has no aesthetic feeling.

It may be unbelievable, but in fact, the pleasure of killing the same kind that the serial murderers pursue is the same as killing Rich...

Schiller paused and said: ...the mood between the impatience to get off work and the joy of enjoying violence and killing is completely different.

I'm more inclined. These three cases were actually done by three people. Schiller touched the corner of his brow.

If you want me to comment, the murderer who killed Lawrence was indeed imitating the crime. His choice of topic may indeed be just like what you said, Jesus and his twelve disciples. He restored the crucifixion as much as possible. Although the method of imitation is a mess, it can be regarded as hard work.

As for the second person, I prefer to call him the imitator of the imitator. If the first murderer copied the correct answer but didn't copy it correctly, then the second murderer copied the first murderer's answer, and the wrong one is even worse. Outrageous.

As for the third murderer, he may very much want to leave the examination room, but under the pressure of teachers and parents, he must write something on it. He looked around and saw the wrong answers of the two people in front of him, but he felt that the wrong answers were also wrong. It's too complicated, so I just copied a 'solution'...

Schiller's analogy is wonderful, but Batman completely understands it. At this moment, he and Schiller's brainwaves match.

As for what happened to this incident, I think the key clue should be on the fourth victim.

I'm investigating this to prevent the fourth victim from appearing.

That's what I said. It's easier for a good detective to face real serial murderers. If I were to do these cases, you can follow the criteria of the first three victims and find my next one. target and protect him.

But now, there may be two or three murderers in these three cases. Their criteria for selecting targets, the time and place of their actions, the process and results of their actions are all completely random, which in turn increases the difficulty.

Who do you think will be the next victim?

Schiller shook his head and said, I didn't do it, how would I know? But I think the relationship between these murderers should be very interesting. Why did the second murderer copy the answers of the first murderer? Why didn't the third murderer even bother to copy the answer?

Does the first killer know that he has been copied? If he knows, will he continue? If he doesn't know, what if the other two killers kill his original second one in advance? Target, isn't that embarrassing?

Now the gang leaders are in danger. They are all hiding in their own manors, just like the Falcone family's castle. Each of them has a safe house in their residence. They already have a police station. After being vigilant, I don't think the murderer will be so easy to get.

But the suspicion has begun to spread, hasn't it? Schiller snapped his fingers, and the dream scene returned to the manor room.

Schiller sat back behind the table, picked up the globe, and then stretched out his hand to hold it down. The moment the globe stopped spinning, the two of them woke up at the same time and returned to the real world.

Conceiving the scene of the crime consumed Batman's energy, and the effect of the crazy wine was still stirring in his mind. Schiller picked up the glass, drank the rest of the wine, and then rummaged through the drawer of the table. A box of cigars came out.

As he lit his cigar, he said, Now, everyone in the Twelve Families should be in danger. They don't know who did it, but there is no doubt that the godfather will not sit idly by.

Once the godfather starts the investigation, a purge operation will begin. You want to protect the fourth victim, but they may not accept your favor. It is more likely. The godfather will not allow you, an outsider, to participate in this matter In the matter, so if you want to continue the investigation, you can only change your perspective.

Another perspective? You mean...

As far as I know, Alberto has already built his house, and now his personality and spirit have stabilized, and he can replace Evans and manipulate his body anytime and anywhere, that is to say, the godfather has a true meaning heirs.

Even if the godfather is unwilling to admit it, Alberto is his only choice. If something like this happens, it is very likely that Alberto will investigate instead of the godfather.

Alberto doesn't have many people available around him. Evans showed a weak and wavering character before, which led to the people around him being wolfish and ambitious followers. Alberto would not use these people. , so now, he should be very short of helpers.

You want me to work for him? But Bruce is an ignorant playboy. How can I explain that I became proficient in various detective skills overnight?

Of course I didn't ask you to go off in person. I found that you still maintain some arrogance from the young master of the Wayne family. You don't care about some small people at all, but sometimes such small people can play a very strong role, such as , that skinny little Copperpot.

Alberto also has the same psychology as you. He may not notice the boy who used to be an umbrella boy, but in fact, I am very optimistic about his potential.

If you recommend him to Alberto, you can learn about all the progress of the case through him, or exert influence on Alberto from the side, and he should be very grateful for your recommendation.

Before you said that Cobbot should work for the godfather, and in the last incident, he wanted to break away from the godfather, and he didn't want to participate in this kind of thing anymore.

But don't forget the reason why he did this, because he can't see hope in Evans. Evans' character is not suitable to be a godfather, but Alberto is different.

Now, the embarrassing thing about Coppert is that Alberto has inherited the memory of Evans. He knows that Copott had a plan to break away from the godfather, and Copott obviously knows this. If he goes back Looking for Alberto, then this kind of back and forth behavior seems disgraceful, and a suitable referrer may be able to alleviate this situation...

If you think you can't find a good time, I can take you and Evans to a vocational education school for an internship tomorrow...

Batman lost his eyes and said, You should know what I suspect...

You think there is a murderer between the two of them?

Coppert has a criminal record, so does Alberto.

Then it's even simpler. It's much easier for you to keep an eye on both of them than to protect the fourth victim who doesn't know who it is...

Late again today, but happy :)