The Director of Music Department

Chen Helin originally wrote a film review titled: "The movie is not bad, but the director is really scared!" However, Chen Nannan persuaded him to leave.

"Grandpa, do you think the director is really persuaded?" Chen Nannan asked while looking at grandpa.

"Isn't it?" Although Chen Helin was stubborn, it also depends on who retorted him.

Chen Nannan is naturally an exception, he is still willing to listen to the thoughts of his baby granddaughter.

"Isn't "I'm Not the God of Medicine" count as facing real problems?" Chen Nannan asked.

Chen Helin groaned for a while and nodded, "I think it is, but it is undeniable that there are a lot of things in this movie, right? The director put it away? So, I think he has a problem?"

"Moreover, the starting point of the movie itself, do you think it is okay? The reason for the high price of this type of targeted drugs is that it is unfair for him to point the finger at drug research and development manufacturers. Drug development requires huge investment and long time cost. Investment. Just imagine if no one is going to develop drugs, how can imitate generic drugs? For patients, then they really have to wait to die. So, the movie doesn't mention the key points at all, does it?"

Chen Nannan shook his head and said, "I don’t think so. At least the director’s courage is commendable. Everyone knows that this problem is definitely not just a problem of drug development manufacturers, but if he really dares to point the finger at where it should be, This movie will not be released, so it is not realistic to change reality through movies."

Chen Helin smiled. He is very pleased to have such a view of his granddaughter, and to have such an idea, at least not for everyone.

However, this still cannot change his opinion.

"I wrote a film review, not anything else, so the director persuaded, you should admit, right?" Chen Helin smiled.

"But don't you think that this is already a great improvement? I think Grandpa is the only one to persuade you. If you go to make a movie, do you think that you really point the finger at where it should be, can the movie be released? At this level, I think the director should have made a lot of effort. Grandpa, if you are like this, don’t you have some crooked ways? Do you have to point out the real things and then be banned? Is the real bravery? It’s not bravery, it’s a fool, it’s a tendon. It’s not bravery, but it doesn’t know how to adapt. It’s banned for a movie like that, and the audience simply Can't see, what's the point?" Chen Nannan was a little excited.

She thinks how grandpa is the same as the directors of those previously banned movies.

Chen Helin's hearty laughter came again. He looked at Chen Nannan's angry look, stopped the laughter, nodded and said: "What you said is not unreasonable, forget it, let's write it, how How? This time, grandpa's name, let you use it?"

Chen Nannan's eyes lit up, and she stepped forward and took her grandfather's arm and said: "Really? I write? Whatever you write? In the name of grandpa?"

Chen Helin nodded and said, "Of course, grandpa will also watch it. If it doesn't meet Grandpa's requirements, I won't let you post it."

Chen Nannan said confidently: "Grandpa, don't worry."

Then, Chen Nannan quickly took out a film review he had written.

"You little clever ghost, are you ready?" Chen Helin couldn't help being amused by his granddaughter.

"Hee hee! Grandpa, take a look, can you see it?" Chen Nannan looked at grandpa expectantly.

Chen Helin nodded and said: "Then let me see, my dear granddaughter, how is it writing."

The first is the title: "I am not a medicine god"-moral and legal contradictions and dislocation!

Chen Helin nodded and said, "This is a good question."

Chen Nannan smiled and did not speak, motioning grandpa to look quickly.

"Remember that there was such a conversation between a pair of mother and daughter sitting next door in the theater.

The little girl asked gently: "Mom, is he a good person or a bad person?"

The little girl's mother replied softly: "He is a good person."

The little girl asked again: "Why did the police arrest him?"

The little girl's mother obviously didn't think about how to answer.

The above conversation happened when Cheng Yong's head was pressed to the ground by the police.

In literary works, there is often a vague sense of chaos that makes people feel embarrassed. This sense of chaos makes it impossible to separate right and wrong, which arouses the audience's thinking and resonance. I am used to calling this sense of chaos "dislocation". In the film "I am not a medicine god", it is precisely between law and morality, between the kindness of the human heart and the atmosphere of greed that this kind of misalignment occurs. This is a rare film with an attitude at the moment when the atmosphere of entertainment is getting stronger and stronger. Not a comedy, but a drama.

This question has made me think for a long time, how should I answer it?

Dislocation between morality and law, the boundary between good and bad, the difference between good and evil.

In terms of law, Cheng Yong is undoubtedly a "bad person", because he violated the law, there is nothing wrong with this, but he did do a morally good thing, so he is a morally "good person."

It is the existence of characters like "Cheng Yong" that narrow the gap between morality and law. Morality is the standard by which people measure all behaviors, and the law is only a mandatory moral guarantee, which is why "Cheng Yong" violated the law and is still respected by people.

So if it was me, I would answer: He did a good deed, so he is a good person, but his behavior is not right, he violated the law at the time, and he was arrested by the police. But you see, even though the police arrested him and left, they still respected him. The police car drove slowly and there were many people on the roadside who saw him off. They all respect him. Therefore, we will also be respectable people in the future, doing things worthy of our conscience, and of course not to violate the law. Let's use the right method to do good things.

At the end of the film, the court sentenced the defendant Cheng Yong to 5 years in prison

From a legal point of view, this sentence was flawed. Cheng Yong was sentenced, but instead of upholding the legal system, he slapped the face to legislate. So many people, those who could not afford medicine, were indirectly sentenced to death. Should they die? The loss caused by such a sentence is 500 deaths, or 2,000 people, or more. How many casualties are there? Isn’t so many casualties a major casualty? Does the judge's conscience hurt? Maybe, but is this the original intention of the legislation? So many people die, if enough is not enough, do the poor deserve to die?

Can you guarantee that you will not get sick and that your family members and loved ones will not get sick? This is a mental torture from the patient's old lady.

In the film, Cheng Yong and a large international company as the defendant and the plaintiff, and the lawyers of each party made separate submissions, but the leukemia patients who were taking medicine as stakeholders were not given the opportunity to speak. In contrast, when law enforcement agencies exercise their investigative powers, a major national pharmaceutical company as a stakeholder is not only involved, but almost all the way through. There is no harm if there is no comparison. It can be seen that our people, the neglected leukemia patients, the most important stakeholders, and the most vulnerable groups that should be protected by the law have truly become vulnerable groups. They have been ignored! ......"