The Director of Music Department

Gu Quancheng is just one microcosm.

He is actually quite lucky, at least he hasn't really sent his daughter out yet.

But there are also children studying abroad. After reading the film reviews, they will also check the information to distinguish the authenticity. Then, the problem is big.

Especially the kind of family where the daughter is going to study abroad, let alone have the axis in my heart!

Well, actually, Xu Min's article is actually a bit exaggerated.

However, for the sake of effect, the definitions of sexual assault and strong (harmonious) **** are completely different.

However, in the film review, Xu Min directly confused the relationship between the two.

In other words, for most people in China who do not understand overseas laws and regulations, sexual assault and strong (harmonious) **** can be conflated.

The film "Chinese Students" has a good reputation among media critics.

However, after all, many media are not so interested in this kind of movie. Although there are related reports, there are not too many.

This is nothing more than normal.

First of all, if a movie wants to get attention, it depends not only on the subject matter, but also on the director and actors.

Lin Feng is just a newcomer director, even if it is a rich second-generation, even if it is Huaxin's Shaodong, he is still just a newcomer in the film and television industry.

In addition, the actors in "Chinese Students" are not big-name actors, so this movie will have some influence on a small scale at best.

However, Xu Min's film review was quickly forwarded by many people.

It is mainly the data and related comments in Xu Min's film review about the sexual assault of overseas students from Australia, Turkey, and China, but it arouses a group of "Kozhi"!

As a result, it caused a lot of discussion on the Internet.

In fact, many people did not know this film review and the so-called investigation report article.

But after "Kozhi" rebuttals and various analyses, soon, Xu Min's film review was noticed by more people.

Similarly, the article by the group of Chinese students who were QJ in Australia was also pulled out again.

In fact, that article had already been refuted by many people before, and many of its parts were untrue. As a result, it caused a very strange phenomenon.

A batch of Ouhei and a batch of "informs" started the debate about your coming and going.

On the one hand, there are Chinese lawyers who are licensed in Australia.

Said that in Australia, strong (harmonious) **** and sexual assault are completely two concepts.

The former is a very serious criminal case, and it is a public prosecution case, and the prosecutor will definitely nail the suspect.

There is no situation where Chinese people are not officially protected abroad.

At the same time refuted the article one by one.

Indignantly, he said that it was the Australian black and it was not true at all.

At the same time, he laughed at Xu Min who was actually a well-known film critic, and ended up taking it out of context without clarifying the truth of the matter.

At the same time, there are overseas Chinese students studying in Ou-Con, saying that there are many channels for seeking help in Australia, and many related human rights organizations have been announced to show that in Australia, it is not helpless and hopeless after being violated.

But these Kochi's rebuttals were quickly questioned by another group of people.

First of all, because in that article, although there are some confusing things, there are also real things in the same.

For example, those interviews with the assaulted Chinese student.

In the end, she did not file a lawsuit because the time has passed too long and the litigation process is very complicated.

Then, someone raised questions. In China, the most common-sense problem is to report to the police. Why choose those human rights organizations in Australia?

It is also said that since the report to the police, strong (harmonious) **** is a felony, then it should be a public prosecution type case, it seems that the parties can not pursue the prosecutor if they do not pursue the prosecutor?

As a result, the two sides quarreled.

While cursing that it is a foreign country, it is a partial generality, saying that Bump is one of the safest countries.

Then, the other side gave the same data, the rate of strong (harmonious) bumps is dozens of times higher than that of island countries.

Then he scolded, clamored and clamored, involuntarily arguing about the movie "Chinese Students".

"There are too many loopholes. First of all, being robbed, indeed in North America, but basically in some relatively poor neighborhoods. As long as you don’t go to that kind of place, you won’t encounter this kind of thing, but the movie is like North America. Robbery is really the same everywhere." This is provocative.

"I really took it upstairs. It seemed like I could not go anywhere. Go, if I was robbed, I deserved it?" This was rebuttal.

As for the case of strong (harmonious) rape, Lin Nana's case.

The same is true for many people.

"It seems that the strong (harmonious) **** case is not allowed to be reconciled in private, right? It can still talk about reconciliation in private, completely ignorant of the law, the director said that it is still an overseas student, is it true?"

Then, the same person in the know directly posted the news that a well-known star was suspected of being a strong (harmonious) rape, but the news of a settlement out of court directly hit the face.

Someone also popularizes the old American side. Only cases involving minors are not allowed to settle. Other cases are acceptable.

Next is the bail system.

This is the most dissatisfaction of many domestic netizens.

"In a free country, no matter how serious the crime is, it seems that money can be released on bail? Is this what you call freedom?"

"I don't think there is any problem with the bail system. It is a very humane system, okay? The laws and regulations of each country are different. Even if the Chinese commit crimes there, they can still be released on bail!"

"But bail is for money. Doesn't it mean that this is a law set up specifically for the rich?"

"If you don't have money to play your mapi, it seems to be fair in China? The rich are the cows, and the whole world is like this."

...

Discussions of this kind have been raging, but on the contrary, the film "Chinese Students" has gradually gained a reputation on the Internet.

This is what Lin Feng himself had never expected.

In fact, the attendance rate of the movie "Chinese Students" is not very high, because the subject matter is indeed not popular, but as the film review was fermented, more and more people joined the discussion. As a result , On the contrary, the attendance rate of the spot screen of "Chinese Students" is getting higher and higher.

It can be said to be a surprise.

On the day of the official release of "Chinese Students", a thousand screens opened.

The box office received 2.8 million! This number is very low for many movies, and the attendance rate is definitely not high.

But for Lin Feng, he was relieved.

However, after "Chinese Students" was officially released, there were many more negative comments.

In fact, realistic subjects can be said to be the most provocative genre in movies.

Because it is the subject of reality, many things are referenced in reality and cannot be used. This is not reality, but the film has brought it through.