Wine and Gun

At that time, I had almost given up on the investigation of Albarino Bacchus, so I just followed the trend to investigate in the direction of the Angel of Death - I couldn't imagine how troublesome it was before, just to get those who had ideas. I don't know how much time it took for the shift schedule in the hospital's inpatient department. Then there are endless visits, investigations, comparisons, bribery... At the beginning of this year, when I was about to go to receive benefits because I had not worked for a long time, I finally found out from the list of hospital employees who had spent so many years. My most likely suspect.

- Coincidentally, it was Shana Bacchus.

Shana Bacchus has been buried in the ground, and I am afraid that it will never be possible to prove what the truth of that year was. But my thoughts can't help but go back to Albarino Bacchus: Seriously, does he really know what happened to his mother? Or back to that beloved topic: Could a serial killer have the same effect on her children?

It was at this point that a crazy but seemingly inexplicable explanation of the Langdon case came to my mind: Could it be that Dr. Bucks killed Sarah Aardman and then put the blame on Langdon? - Of course, he probably had to have an accomplice, otherwise he would hardly have time to put Sarah's hair in the Langdon's house, but didn't Todd also say "there was a guy by his side"? ——And finally killed Langdon in order to silence him?

Only the same criminal signature "Mint Grass" can be explained only if both cases are owned by one person.

But in this way, it is difficult to explain whether the murderer is a gardener or a pianist - the gardener does not need to blame others for Sarah's death, he only needs to arrange Sarah as a large bonsai; I don't think the pianist is likely to kill Sarah either. He should be a murderous man with a moral system of his own, so he won't kill anyone other than a criminal.

And I can't imagine that a murderer like a pianist or a gardener would be so inaccurate enough to leave his fingerprints on the knife on Sarah's chest.

So the most likely fact is probably this: Bacchus killed Sarah because of a relationship dispute, and then put the blame on Langdon (though I still can't imagine how he found out that Langdon was the serial killer of women in red) of the murderer), and then killed Langdon so that nothing had ever happened.

Of course, this is only a preliminary guess, because it seems that some details are not feasible after all. I originally wanted to do a deeper investigation, but soon the murderer committed a crime in Buffalo, and I had to temporarily forget about it and rush to Buffalo.

——The latter things have been reported in many newspapers, and I do not need to describe them in detail. All in all, my investigation in Buffalo was much smoother than in Westland, and I quickly got my testimony about the butcher and turned to criminal psychologist Olga Molozze.

Then there was a series of pursuits like a series of Hollywood movies. My legs are like this. Why do you have to let me do things like this? Anyway, I stabbed the slaughtering little bastard when he nearly opened Albarino Bacchus's head.

I didn't expect that I would meet Dr. Bacchus in this case, after all I didn't know he was a friend of Molozer. But apparently it happened to me in such a simple and crude way: when I stabbed McAdam with the knife, I saw Bacchus look a little weird for a moment - it was suspiciously fast and it was just an illusion, but I did He saw a vague interest flash in Bacchus' eyes.

If I only knew he was a normal guy, I'd say my conclusions are crazy. But on the contrary, I knew about Shana Bacchus, so at that moment I was convinced that Albarino Bacchus knew exactly what happened to his mother. Not only that, maybe he will follow in his mother's footsteps, perhaps he has already followed his mother's footsteps - he is standing on a dangerous borderline.

Later in our messy rescue team on Fifteenth Avenue, I stood near the disservice John Garcia, actually overhearing the conversation between Bacchus and Herstal Armalette. In fact, I was quite surprised about the relationship between the two of them. Molozer told me before that they were a couple, but with all due respect, Amarette doesn't seem like the type that would fall in love with someone.

The voices of the two of them were always very low, and only a few words leaked into my ears, but I could clearly see Amarette punching Bacchus in the abdomen, it looked painful - Bacchus With a dead face that didn't match the impression he left on the public, he leaned in Amalette's arms for a long time, and then straightened up and said something.

Then I heard Amarette raise her voice slightly and say, "You shouldn't hug him if you know it's dangerous, I thought it was common sense."

What are they talking about?

"So," Bacchus's voice rose accordingly, still brisk, "are you still angry? In the case of Blanca Areola?"

Armalite's brows were still not lifted, he was silent for a while, and then said: "Your speculation about many things is wrong."

Bacchus nodded, then continued, "Then you're mad about—?"

Search [Book Reading Assistant] official address: www.kanshuzhushou.com Millions of popular books are free to read for life without advertisements!