Wealth

Everyone can see Dou Shi, the opportunity to tattoo and document Xin Yi thought. It is a bad example of the utilitarian mentality of the Chinese people, especially it has blinded the eyes of some economists and economic people.

Some economists argued that the document merely repeated the legal provisions, which cannot be blinded by sober jurists.

Therefore, the No. 1 Document is likely to be a terrible leader in the country, leading to the proliferation of original sin theory, leading to legal confusion in which criminal prosecution procedures cannot be initiated without investigation. Since then, Chinese private entrepreneurs have no good people, they are all born sinners.

The result of this is that, on the basis of the original sin hat, civil businessmen can always respect the national bourgeoisie to revolutionize their property, or carry out so-called redemption.

The original sin theory of private entrepreneurs typically embodies the plight of real private entrepreneurs to survive and develop in China. This plight is an embarrassing situation.

The first side is the bureaucratic class, and the first side is the official business, the powerful capital, and the black capital. The third side is the embarrassment of transnational capital, and the fourth side is the working class who does not know the truth.

Just like the tradition since ancient times, the first oppression faced by real private entrepreneurs in China today is still the bureaucracy. In front of the bureaucracy, private entrepreneurs are always oppressed. Their breathing space needs to be granted by the bureaucracy, and their breathing rules need to be approved or even formulated by the bureaucracy.

Under the centralized system, private entrepreneurs are the objects that the bureaucracy wants to control. On the one hand, they need to survive and develop, to add luster to their political achievements, and to provide motivation for economic development. On the other hand, they are afraid that they will grow to have equal dialogue. The power threatens the privilege of his own hands.

Therefore, when it comes to policies, it always encourages its development on the one hand, and discriminates on the other.

This document is an upright official act in good faith and encourages civil and commercial exhibitions, but this encouragement is an encouragement for civil and commercial companies to wear a crime-collecting hat. It fundamentally put civil and commercial enterprises to death.

It is conceivable that when the bureaucracy attracts foreign capital, it will never give foreign capital the original sin hat of capitalism. But why do you take a completely unreliable attitude toward private capital? At least in today's China, in terms of market opportunities, it is better to give foreign capital than domestic capital, and to the rich and powerful than the private sector. Private entrepreneurs are always at the bottom of the capital.

"Actually, strictly speaking, I can't be regarded as a private entrepreneur." Fan Wubing said to his father Fan Heng, "Because of your relationship. I can be assigned to the official business, because the capital is mainly overseas, and I started my career. Overseas, so I can also be regarded as a transnational capital, and my own influence has caused headaches for the entire senior management but helpless, so I am also regarded as a wealthy capital. If you count my personal arms or something, I will say that I am a black It's not an exaggeration to dominate capital."

Fan Xiang smiled and shook his head. He knew in his heart that his son had a very obvious tendency toward this matter, so he was so excited and not calm. In fact, Fan Investment Group can be regarded as a multinational capital at best.

As for talking about official business, powerful capital, black tyrant capital, etc., it is purely an expression of venting anger.

NS.

Official business, powerful capital, and black capital are the three types of privileged capital in China.

Officials and businessmen are naturally granted privileges, which are embodied in four aspects: one is a two-brand team, which is not only a business, but also a competent administrative agency and market judge; the other is a natural and compulsory monopoly status and rights ; The third is the unlimited input of funds backed by finance and finance; the fourth is judicial protection.

The opportunity for private entrepreneurs to compete with the government and business is the gift of the government and business, and naturally they will not have the ability to truly compete. Powerful capital sometimes uses the official business brand. Sometimes the brand of private entrepreneurs is used, and sometimes the brand of foreign businessmen is used. The root lies in their deep bureaucratic background. The real private entrepreneurs lack all their noble blood, and their personality is humble, so naturally they have to be inferior.

head.

As for the black bully capital, it is usually owned by one party. There is nothing outside the land, but inside the land, he is known as the boss. Of course, this boss will not be arrogant to officials, businessmen, and powerful people. If you call your father or mother, you call your father or mother, and you should call your brother or brother. But it is enough to bully private entrepreneurs and ordinary people.

In today's shopping malls, it is the ethos to show off the white and the underworld, and it is the specific manifestation of this pressure.

Multinational capital is the third most important oppression of China’s real private entrepreneurs. With the international political power of its own country, multinational capital does not have too many political worries in China. It can be fully respected by the bureaucracy and exert influence on the Chinese government. Even stress.

As for China’s official business, powerful capital, and black capital, they should respect when they should respect, when they should be excluded, and when they cooperate, they should cooperate. Therefore, they cannot become real market competitors of multinational capital. The real market competitors of multinational capital are the real private entrepreneurs in China.

But at least in the near term,

Kou’s business is too young and naive. In the face of multinational capital, it can only be used for one purpose. There is no even the slightest strength to fight back against the opponent's squabbling.

With the large-scale recession and disintegration of China's state-owned economy and collective economy, although there are factors such as the influx of foreign capital to ease the employment situation, but. Employment in China will be mainly undertaken by genuine private entrepreneurs, that is, ordinary private capital.

From the perspective of industrial structure, labor-intensive industries and ordinary service industries are the world of private entrepreneurs. From the perspective of capital scale, private entrepreneurs are also concentrated at the level of small and medium-sized enterprises. From the perspective of technological content, those extensive industries are also dominated by private entrepreneurs.

Because of this, the capital that the domestic working class, especially the low-income working class, urban poor and migrant workers, is mainly exposed to ordinary private capital. In this way, private capital is on the front line facing the working class. In the process of employment with the working class, they have a mutual dependence and co-existence relationship, and they will inevitably have more and more conflicts. .

In a country where left-leaning thinking has a huge spiritual market, if private capital is given a hat of original sin, the working class will naturally be more directed towards ordinary private capital in the struggle for survival of the entire "society."

"Private enterprises are nothing more than a fig leaf for the rich and powerful. You throw them away after you use them. When you need to use them again, you get them and leave." After experiencing so many things, Fan Wubing finally understood the problem. .

Fan Heng shook his head and said nothing. This kind of topic is really not suitable for discussion.

The tradition of business has always been divided into official business and civil business.

There are three types of civil and commercial in China in ancient times: after the resignation of bureaucrats or the relatives of bureaucrats use government power to engage in production and trade; they are not bureaucrats and their relatives, but form alliances with bureaucrats and their institutions. Relying on government power to engage in production and trade; real civil businessmen that have nothing to do with the government.

In ancient times, bureaucracy was usually only set up at the county level, so daily commercial activities were basically dominated by real civil business. It is typical of porcelain production, which is divided into official kilns and civil kilns. Although the official kilns are of high quality, they are few in number, and sometimes they can only meet the royal consumption. It is the folk kilns that meet the basic domestic needs.

Yangzhou in Sui and Tang, Quanzhou in Song and Yuan. The prosperity of Suzhou in the Ming and Qing dynasties relied on the real civil businessmen.

Nowadays, in China, due to the general management of production and trade, the survival and development of civil businessmen are greatly restricted.

Now even if you open a small restaurant, you have to establish a cooperative relationship with industry and commerce, taxation, health, public security, street or township government, neighborhood committee or village committee, etc. This kind of cooperation cannot escape the least privately if it is not nominal. Operation, for example. To deal with the old man and old lady who collect garbage fees, to deal with the defense team, to deal with the city management team and so on.

Since ancient times, the real contribution of civil business. It opened up and supported overseas trade.

Under the overall bureaucratic rule of society. A real civil business may seek prosperity for a while, but there is no long-term solution, and its primitive accumulation and growth are very difficult, just like the vegetation drilled from under the boulder, finally seeing the sun, after all, it is not a big success.

Therefore, especially in the southeast coastal area, many real civil businessmen seek a way out of the ocean. To escape the oppression of the bureaucracy. Even during the maritime ban, this activity did not stop.

All in all, the confrontation between government and businessmen has always existed, or it can be understood as confrontation between bureaucracy and grass-roots people.

But no matter what ~www.wuxiamtl.com~Hebei's behavior in this matter has obviously already been out of the high-level psychological endurance, Fan Heng can't sit back and watch this matter and show to the uncontrollable Ark.

So at the Standing Committee, he specifically raised this question, "This wind cannot grow."

The opinions of several Standing Committee members attending the meeting were quite consistent on this issue. They believed that Hebei had made a bad start on this issue, and the intentions of this matter can be understood regardless of the intention, and one of the Standing Committee members also expressed it. I have received some questions about violations of regulations and disciplines by the leaders of Hebei.

"This is to be checked carefully to see where the problem is." Chief One said.

The old and new leaders are in the transition period. When the two sessions are over, even if they are officially handed over, some leadership positions have already begun to transition at this time. Therefore, whether it is the new leadership group or the old leaders, the I pay more attention to this issue. I think that in this sensitive period, Hebei has come up with such an outstanding sentiment, which is really a bit of suspicion of fishing in troubled waters.

But what is unexpected is that the Hebei No. 1 document incident here has not been completely resolved. Another thing happened over there. The controversy between the state advances and the people retreat and the state retreats and the people advance, as well as the loss of state-owned assets, was once brought to the forefront.