Wealth

People who are in the upper ranks can often see the problem more clearly, not only that people who can stand in this position are wise and wise people, but also because once they are in this position, There are very few simple interests that can hold them back.

Under such circumstances, coupled with the possession of very considerable intelligence resources and access, it is actually relatively easy to look at the problem objectively. It is precisely because one's own interests are in fact the interests of all citizens that they can straighten out various relationships and make selective judgments.

On the issue of how to treat state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, and the issue of who is the most important and who is the least, there is actually no need to say anything.

As early as the mid-1980s, due to the dual-track price system. There was a back-to-back reselling. The first category is that government-run "private" companies engage in crazy reselling activities, but the profits from reselling still belong to the government in nature. There are two basic ways to privately possess it, one is in the name of contract, and the other is corruption.

The other is the pseudo-collective and state-owned companies that have private investment and wear collective hats.

At that time, the new township and village enterprises were forced to be excluded from the raw material plan. They were the last recipients of raw material reselling activities, and sometimes they also carried out reselling themselves. At the same time, countless coffins have emerged in the society, with one billion people and one billion people.

In this process, the trend of bribery compensation and introduction of bribery strategies flourished, which is commonly referred to as the kickback trend.

In this way, a group of scalping private capital, accumulators of corruption, and accumulators of bribery have emerged in China. Introduce bribery accumulators. In the anti-corruption investigations conducted in the late 1980s, there were a large number of

example.

However, these private capitals are not private capital in essence. The source of their accumulation is government capital, which relies on the conversion of state and collective capital to private capital. Therefore, their crimes are not so much the crime of private capital as the official capital. The crime of operating capital is a crime of rights and their relationship.

After entering the 1990s, a batch of private capital of over 100,000 or more than one million level accumulated through financial activities or financial operations appeared. One is through the purchase of stock subscription certificates and stocks. They are not guilty, and guilty is also the naive sin of the Chinese stock market itself. In addition to this, there is not only sinful, but also sinful. They took advantage of the irregularities of banks and the bribery of bank officials to obtain huge bank loans in the name of collective enterprises, and then transferred the funds to individuals or their own private enterprises, and the collective enterprises continued to bear bank debts.

The essence of this situation is corruption, which is closely related to the official rights of the corrupt. Therefore, the crime is still an official crime, an official and commercial crime, not a civil and commercial crime.

After Di Gong's visit to the south in 1992, domestic private capital quickly emerged. For example, Fan Wuyi returned to China from the United States at this time to make a big splash. This is also a new aspect of the domestic economic take-off. The significance of the entire reform and opening up is very significant.

There are many reasons for the rapid growth of private capital at this time.

In terms of crime, there are mainly such situations. Accept bribes, accept bribes together, introduce bribes.

For example, a person who was known as the first private entrepreneur in a certain city had his assets of 20 to 30 million yuan in the mid-1990s. His original position was a cadre in charge of the supply of crude oil. He said he took too many bribes. Fearing that he would be shot after exposure, he resigned and set up a factory.

There is also a person who organizes private equity funds to operate stocks. There are two villas in Beijing alone and four or five villas and high-end residences in Shanghai. Claiming that he no longer knows how to spend the money, he used to be in charge of import and export approval by a certain ministries and commissions under the State Council. He accumulated a lot of money in his position. The people inside are guaranteed to make a profit.

There are also embezzlement, misappropriation of public funds to accumulate capital, and use the resources of official positions to support relatives or reliable people to operate. When the time is right, get out and clarify your own shares.

Then there are smuggling, counterfeiting, and financial fraud.

In this, at least the first few are direct crimes of duty, not the crime of private capital, it is not the crime of private capital, there is no such thing as the crime of private capital. And the latter ones. Even if it is not an official crime. To be big is also inextricably linked with other people's duty crimes.

Another situation is more complicated, and that is the buyout of public enterprises.

Some people deliberately use the privatization policy to turn a high amount of public capital into a low amount of private capital. It's full of tricks, and it's not impossible to judge guilt from experience. However, because the government is accustomed to a one-size-fits-all working method, more often it is to "send" public assets to the heads of enterprises and "force" them to become private owners.

In some corporate buyout campaigns that year. When the party committee and the government propose to buy out enterprises at the town and village levels, the purchasers are naturally the factory directors and managers of these enterprises. Except for individual factory directors and managers who expressed their willingness to transform into private bosses, most of them are not active. The reason is not in business, but in capital. They can’t get the money. Some people say, “We have always been honest and paid wages according to the rules. Judgment, do you think that we were all corrupters in the past, and there was a lot of money hidden in our family? I knew this a long time ago. We were corrupt in the past."

As a result, in order to complete the buyout task, public assets had to be greatly discounted, and only flexible measures were taken in the way of collecting the buyout money, resulting in a half-selling and half-free situation.

In summary, after the embryonic period, domestic private capital continued to join this team from the 1980s to the 1990s. Gradually from innocence to guilt, from misdemeanor to felony. From less sinful to more sinful. but. Since it is not in the embryonic stage, it cannot be said to be the original sin.

Domestic private capital is an overall concept, a class or stratum, which must be examined from its overall evolution, and the guilt of later entrants can be traced back to the original sin. Does not conform to the basic logic.

These guilties come from bureaucrats, bureaucrats and businessmen, and their allies. They are not really private enterprises. The nongovernmental nature of private capital determines that only real private enterprises can represent the essence of private capital. Therefore, in essence, these Guilty private capital cannot represent the whole. Private capital is guilty, let alone the original sin of private enterprises.

After those guilty were converted to private capital. It basically belongs to the type of bureaucratic resignation or bureaucratic relatives who use government power to engage in production and trade. They form alliances with bureaucrats and their relatives but form alliances with bureaucrats and their institutions and engage in production and trade with the help of government power. Although the amount of capital is very large, it does not mean that it accounts for the vast majority of private capital in terms of numbers.

In fact, the domestic private capital population is mostly small business owners, small traders, small processing owners, and small business owners. therefore. A small number of people are guilty of urination and the whole population is guilty.

These crimes were mainly committed not when they became private capital, but mainly when they were bureaucrats.

From this perspective, their crime is not the crime of private capital, but the crime of bureaucratic capital. As private capital, they should be innocent. If they were called original sins because they were bureaucrats who had accumulated capital through crimes when they were bureaucrats and transferred to the ranks of private capital, this is equivalent to saying that after the puppet army surrendered, rebelled and reorganized into the Eighth Route Army, the Eighth Route Army was accused of traitorous crimes. Just as ridiculous.

It cannot be denied that some individuals of private capital will be guilty, such as those who accumulate capital through counterfeiting and trafficking, but the guilt of an individual cannot be equal to the guilt of the private capital as a whole. The peasant crime is not the same as the peasant class's guilt.

Another argument for accusing private capital of the original sin is to judge indiscriminately that they have always had serious tax evasion. This is obviously a crude and irrational accusation. The basic goal of all capital with autonomous status is always profit, and profit with practical significance is always after-tax profit. Therefore, they will all try to reduce their tax expenditures.

Because of this, tax design and tax rate adjustment have become one of the basic economic powers of a country.

When national taxes and tax rates cannot be reduced or exempted, there are two basic ways to reduce taxes: one is tax avoidance, and the other is tax evasion. Reasonable tax avoidance involves complicated business skills and accounting techniques, which is both reasonable and legal, and there is no question of whether it is a crime. Tax evasion is illegal, but only when the amount of tax evasion reaches a certain amount does it constitute a crime.

Reasonable tax avoidance is a common phenomenon. It can be considered that any business operator who does not understand or does not try to avoid tax reasonably is not a qualified or qualified business operator. Compared with reasonable tax avoidance, tax evasion is always a minority phenomenon.

The problem is that the government is based on financial interests. Reasonable tax avoidance is not encouraged and supported, and there is also a lack of research on reasonable tax avoidance. Facing the general facts of reasonable tax avoidance, they are all conceptually denounced as tax evasion, and even sometimes they are punished in accordance with tax evasion. The illusion of tax evasion is widespread in China, and a strong empirical public opinion has been formed, and the spearhead of public opinion has been unreasonably led to private capital.

The fact is that due to the growing bloat of government agencies, the gentrification and aristocracy of civil servants. He has long been keen on investment in various image projects. As a result, finances increasingly fall into a deficit trap. Therefore, the government's tax collection is increasingly strengthened.

The increase in tax revenue has exceeded the growth of the national economy, reflecting the government's tax oppression on enterprises.

The long-term discriminated status of private enterprises determines that they are bound to be the weakest in the corporate world when faced with high taxes. Tax evasion of the same amount is generally not subject to criminal prosecution in state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises, and foreign enterprises, while private enterprises will naturally be prosecuted. Follow up criminal investigations.

Although the absolute number of private companies that have been criminally prosecuted for tax evasion is not large, state-owned enterprises, collective enterprises, and foreign companies have rarely been criminally prosecuted for tax evasion. Therefore, this has further created the social illusion of tax evasion by private companies.

It can be seen from this that the judgment of China's private capital has always been serious tax evasion behavior is based on a false reality of social public opinion, a kind of misguided public opinion.

The high-level government's debate over the Hebei Document No. 1 also continued for several days. Everyone was so quarrelsome that they couldn't talk about it, and finally they agreed. Think that the introduction of this document is out of time.

In fact, the introduction of this document also conflicts with the current macro-controls being carried out by high-level officials. The central government wants to regulate large-amount investment, while this document from Hebei seems to be for private enterprises on the surface. It remains to be, but in fact it is to loosen up some large-scale bureaucratic capital in order to obtain return investment.

According to statistics, last year, the value added of the private economy in Hebei accounted for 3% of the GDP, which was a percentage point lower than that of Xijiang. A percentage point lower than that of Jiangsu; the number of private enterprises in Xijiang is 23 times that of Hebei, and Jiangsu is 32 times that of Hebei.

Therefore, if Hebei's economy is to have a major development, it must have a major breakthrough in the development of the private economy. The leaders of the province have a very clear understanding of this.

In their words, the development of the private economy is in addition to some support in funds and projects. What is more important is to give the private economy equal legal status and a level playing field. As far as political and legal agencies are concerned, domestic and foreign investment is not distinguished in cracking down on illegal crimes; no matter what the elements are, the protection of legitimate rights and interests will never engage in policy discrimination or differential treatment. The lawful rights and interests of the private economy must be protected with confidence; the violation of the lawful rights and interests of the private economy must be resolutely corrected. Of course, if private enterprises commit crimes, they must be dealt with in accordance with the law.

In fact, the situation is a bit different. In this place of Hebei, smuggling and counterfeiting were also highly advocated, and the underworld forces in some places are quite serious, but after years of exhibitions, these people have basically been whitewashed, and some have even become involved. An ~www.wuxiamtl.com~ became a member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference and even a deputy to the National People's Congress.

However, one thing is very important, that is, the soles of everyone's shoes are muddy and watery, and they don't seem to be able to see it when they are standing still. As long as they lift their feet when they act, they will show up immediately.

For this reason, the pardon order regarding original sin has become a key to the exchange of benefits.

After the high-level intervened in this matter, Li Jian found out the reasons for the issuance of this document, and at the same time found a few that prompted the publication of this document along the way. Needless to say, the key person, as long as he checked it carefully, he immediately found out a bunch of old accounts, and several people were all washed out by the underworld. Therefore, some old cases and even homicides in the past are all in their throats.

This time, I used the opportunity of concocting Document No. 1 to completely solve my problem. But I didn't expect this matter to be a little bit louder. The media's hype and controversy also made them at the forefront of the storm, so the results obtained are unexpected.

On the premise of expressing their dissatisfaction with Hebei, the high-level officials immediately dispatched an investigation team to conduct a review. The results were reported by the masses and official evidence collection. The crimes of some people were confirmed. In the end, more than 20 people were arrested, and most of them were murdered.